Cross-Domain Enterprise Agent Network
One specialised agent per business domain, each grounded in its own system of record — cross-functional workflows route typed artifacts between domains via a standardised inter-agent protocol.
Intent & Description
🎯 Intent
Decompose enterprise agency into domain-specialised agents (finance, supply chain, HR, service), each grounded in its own system of record, and orchestrate cross-functional workflows by routing artifacts between them through a standardised inter-agent protocol.
📋 Context
A large enterprise already runs its business across many backing systems — ERP, CRM, HR system, ticketing. End-to-end workflows cross those boundaries. A dispute moves from customer service into finance into supply chain; closing a quarter pulls from half a dozen sources. Each domain has its own data model, vocabulary, compliance rules, and owning team.
💡 Solution
Build one specialised agent per business domain, each with its own grounded data, tool palette, and acceptance criteria. Define a standardised inter-agent protocol for handoffs (A2A, MCP). When a task crosses domains, the source agent routes to the target via the protocol, passing a typed artifact. An optional supervisor or role-based assistant fronts the user and dispatches to the right entry agent.
Real-world Use Case
- Enterprise agency spans multiple domains (finance, supply chain, HR, service) each with its own system of record.
- A standardised inter-agent protocol (A2A, MCP) is available or can be adopted.
- Each domain benefits from its own grounded data, tool palette, and acceptance criteria.
Source
📌 TL;DR
One agent per domain, each grounded in its own system of record, connected via a standardised protocol — cross-functional workflows route typed artifacts between domains instead of one agent trying to know everything.
Advantages
- Each domain agent stays small, grounded, and ownable by its domain team.
- Cross-domain workflows are auditable per agent at every handoff boundary.
- Domain teams can ship and update their agents independently.
Disadvantages
- Protocol design is the core engineering problem — a bad protocol fossilizes mistakes across every domain.
- Routing decisions become a second-order problem: who handles what, and who decides?
- Failure attribution across the chain is significantly harder than for a single monolithic agent.