Patterns
Governance Checklist
Guardrails ACS / Governance Checklist

Governance and Maturity Checklist

Use this checklist to gauge where an agent β€” or your whole agent estate β€” sits.


Foundational

Basic Instrumentation

  • User Message and Agent Response hooks instrumented on every production agent

    • Every agent has input and output boundary hooks
    • Hooks are firing consistently and reliably
    • Basic policy evaluation is working
  • Guardian Agent exists as a distinct, testable service

    • Guardian Agent is deployed and accessible
    • Policy evaluation logic is centralized
    • Service has monitoring and health checks
  • Basic trace events reach a central log

    • Session start/end events are captured
    • Tool calls are logged
    • Trace data is stored and queryable

Foundational Capabilities

At this level, you can:

  • Monitor basic agent interactions
  • Enforce simple input/output policies
  • Detect obvious security issues
  • Audit agent activity at a basic level

Foundational Gaps

Typical gaps at this level:

  • No tool-level controls
  • No memory or knowledge protection
  • No structured security event mapping
  • No component inventory
  • No formal governance processes

Managed

Extended Instrumentation

  • Tool Call Request/Result hooks instrumented with parameter-level (not just tool-name) policy

    • Tool calls are evaluated before execution
    • Parameters are inspected, not just tool names
    • Tool results are screened before agent consumption
  • Memory and Knowledge hooks instrumented

    • Memory write operations are gated
    • Memory read operations are screened
    • Knowledge retrieval is inspected
    • Both read and write paths are protected

Security Integration

  • Trace events mapped to OCSF and flowing into the enterprise SIEM

    • Security-relevant events are converted to OCSF format
    • Events are forwarded to existing SIEM infrastructure
    • Security team can query and analyze agent events
  • Static AgBOM exists for every production agent

    • Initial component inventory is complete
    • AgBOM is captured in CycloneDX or SPDX format
    • Component lists are reviewed and approved

Governance Processes

  • Verdict logs reviewed on a fixed cadence
    • Guardian Agent decisions are reviewed regularly
    • False positive/negative rates are tracked
    • Policies are tuned based on review findings

Managed Capabilities

At this level, you can:

  • Control tool usage with parameter-level precision
  • Protect memory and knowledge from poisoning
  • Integrate agent security with existing security operations
  • Inventory and track agent components
  • Review and tune security policies systematically

Managed Gaps

Typical gaps at this level:

  • No protocol-level controls (MCP, A2A)
  • Static rather than dynamic inventory
  • No enterprise-specific classifiers
  • No explicit compliance mapping
  • No red-team testing program

Optimized

Protocol-Level Controls

  • MCP and A2A protocol-level hooks instrumented for every agent that uses them
    • MCP outbound connections are gated
    • MCP inbound traffic is screened
    • A2A task delegation is authenticated
    • A2A messages are authorized

Dynamic Inventory

  • AgBOM is dynamic β€” regenerates automatically on capability discovery
    • New tool connections trigger AgBOM updates
    • MCP server connections are detected and recorded
    • Model switches are captured in inventory
    • AgBOM stays current without manual intervention

Enterprise Integration

  • Tier 3 enterprise classifiers (PII/PHI, cost, jurisdiction) plugged into the Guardian Agent
    • Organizational data classification is integrated
    • Cost monitoring and alerting is active
    • Jurisdiction-specific rules are enforced
    • Industry-specific requirements are addressed

Compliance Mapping

  • Explicit compliance crosswalk maintained (EU AI Act Article 14, NIST AI RMF)
    • ACS controls are mapped to regulatory requirements
    • Compliance evidence is systematically collected
    • Legal and risk teams understand the technical implementation
    • Audit-ready documentation is maintained

Security Testing

  • Red-team testing against the full ASI01–ASI10 catalog is part of the release process
    • New agents are tested against all ASI scenarios
    • Red-team findings are addressed before deployment
    • Testing is repeated regularly, not just at release
    • Test results inform policy improvements

Community Engagement

  • Learnings fed back to the open ACS/AOS specification
    • Implementation issues are reported to the community
    • Feature requests are submitted based on production experience
    • Best practices are shared with other adopters
    • Contributions are made to the open-source project

Optimized Capabilities

At this level, you can:

  • Control protocol-level agent interactions
  • Maintain real-time component inventories
  • Enforce organization-specific security requirements
  • Demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements
  • Validate security controls through adversarial testing
  • Influence the evolution of the ACS/AOS standards

Optimized Characteristics

At this level, your implementation:

  • Is comprehensive β€” covers all ACS capabilities
  • Is integrated β€” works seamlessly with existing security infrastructure
  • Is dynamic β€” adapts automatically to changes
  • Is validated β€” tested through adversarial scenarios
  • Is compliant β€” mapped to regulatory requirements
  • Is contributory β€” improves the broader ecosystem

Maturity Assessment

Scoring Your Maturity

Use this scoring system to assess your overall maturity:

LevelCriteria CountWeight
Foundational3 items1 point each
Managed5 items2 points each
Optimized6 items3 points each

Maximum Score: 35 points

Maturity Levels

  • 0-5 points: Initial β€” Basic experimentation, no production deployment
  • 6-15 points: Foundational β€” Production deployment with basic controls
  • 16-25 points: Managed β€” Comprehensive controls with security integration
  • 26-35 points: Optimized β€” Full ACS implementation with compliance validation

Improvement Path

Identify gaps at your current level and prioritize:

  1. Complete all items at your current level before moving up
  2. Focus on high-impact items first β€” security-critical controls
  3. Address dependencies β€” some items require others to be complete
  4. Plan for governance β€” processes are as important as technology

Implementation Timeline

From Initial to Foundational (1-3 months)

  • Deploy Guardian Agent service
  • Instrument input/output hooks on critical agents
  • Set up basic trace collection
  • Establish initial governance processes

From Foundational to Managed (3-6 months)

  • Extend instrumentation to tool calls
  • Add memory and knowledge hooks
  • Integrate with SIEM and security operations
  • Create initial AgBOM for all agents
  • Establish regular policy review cadence

From Managed to Optimized (6-12 months)

  • Add protocol-level controls (MCP, A2A)
  • Implement dynamic AgBOM updates
  • Integrate enterprise classifiers
  • Map controls to compliance requirements
  • Establish red-team testing program
  • Engage with ACS/AOS community

Continuous Improvement

Regular Assessments

Schedule maturity assessments:

  • Quarterly for Foundational implementations
  • Bi-annually for Managed implementations
  • Annually for Optimized implementations

Assessment Focus Areas

Each assessment should review:

  • Technology coverage β€” are all required hooks instrumented?
  • Policy effectiveness β€” are controls working as intended?
  • Integration quality β€” is security integration effective?
  • Governance processes β€” are reviews and testing happening?
  • Compliance status β€” are regulatory requirements met?

Improvement Planning

Use assessment results to:

  • Identify gaps β€” missing capabilities or processes
  • Prioritize improvements β€” focus on highest-impact items
  • Plan next steps β€” create roadmap for advancement
  • Track progress β€” measure improvement over time

Key Takeaways

  1. Three maturity levels β€” Foundational, Managed, Optimized
  2. Clear criteria β€” specific, measurable items at each level
  3. Progressive advancement β€” complete each level before moving up
  4. Balanced focus β€” technology, process, and compliance
  5. Continuous improvement β€” regular assessments and planning
  6. Community engagement β€” contribute back at higher maturity levels

Next Steps

  • Ecosystem & Roadmap β€” understand how ACS is evolving and where it’s headed
  • Limitations & Critique β€” understand the current constraints and considerations